Our Case Studies
Our Case Studies
Our Case Studies
Standing Apart, Delivering More
01
SIAC-administered UNCITRAL arbitration against Asian state oil and gas company in oil and gas pipeline dispute
Key Point
Rules: UNCITRAL, SIAC-administered
Parties: International firm vs Asian state oil company
Sector: Oil & gas pipeline dispute
Issues: Breach, delays, cost claims
Focus: Neutral, enforceable arbitration
01
SIAC-administered UNCITRAL arbitration against Asian state oil and gas company in oil and gas pipeline dispute
Key Point
Rules: UNCITRAL, SIAC-administered
Parties: International firm vs Asian state oil company
Sector: Oil & gas pipeline dispute
Issues: Breach, delays, cost claims
Focus: Neutral, enforceable arbitration
01
SIAC-administered UNCITRAL arbitration against Asian state oil and gas company in oil and gas pipeline dispute
Key Point
Rules: UNCITRAL, SIAC-administered
Parties: International firm vs Asian state oil company
Sector: Oil & gas pipeline dispute
Issues: Breach, delays, cost claims
Focus: Neutral, enforceable arbitration
02
Three Arrows Capital
Key Point
Case: First mega crypto arbitration globally
Client: Three Arrows Capital, crypto hedge fund
Claims: Over US$2.4 billion in dispute
Proceedings: Emergency arbitration + main arbitration
Forum/Law: AAA Arbitration, New York seat, New York law
02
Three Arrows Capital
Key Point
Case: First mega crypto arbitration globally
Client: Three Arrows Capital, crypto hedge fund
Claims: Over US$2.4 billion in dispute
Proceedings: Emergency arbitration + main arbitration
Forum/Law: AAA Arbitration, New York seat, New York law
02
Three Arrows Capital
Key Point
Case: First mega crypto arbitration globally
Client: Three Arrows Capital, crypto hedge fund
Claims: Over US$2.4 billion in dispute
Proceedings: Emergency arbitration + main arbitration
Forum/Law: AAA Arbitration, New York seat, New York law
03
Electric-grid concession company against state-owned electricity company and regulator
Key Point
Parties: Concession company vs. state utility & regulator
Claims: US$350m; counterclaims US$400m
Rules: UNCITRAL, London seat
Law: English law
Role: Counsel for concession company
03
Electric-grid concession company against state-owned electricity company and regulator
Key Point
Parties: Concession company vs. state utility & regulator
Claims: US$350m; counterclaims US$400m
Rules: UNCITRAL, London seat
Law: English law
Role: Counsel for concession company
03
Electric-grid concession company against state-owned electricity company and regulator
Key Point
Parties: Concession company vs. state utility & regulator
Claims: US$350m; counterclaims US$400m
Rules: UNCITRAL, London seat
Law: English law
Role: Counsel for concession company
04
ICSID arbitration against United Arab Emirates under the Turkish-UAE bilateral investment treaty.
Key Point
Arbitration: ICSID, under Turkey–UAE BIT
Parties: Investor vs. United Arab Emirates
Dispute: Land reclamation project
Outcome: Won arbitration for investor
Treaty: Turkish–UAE bilateral investment treaty
04
ICSID arbitration against United Arab Emirates under the Turkish-UAE bilateral investment treaty.
Key Point
Arbitration: ICSID, under Turkey–UAE BIT
Parties: Investor vs. United Arab Emirates
Dispute: Land reclamation project
Outcome: Won arbitration for investor
Treaty: Turkish–UAE bilateral investment treaty
04
ICSID arbitration against United Arab Emirates under the Turkish-UAE bilateral investment treaty.
Key Point
Arbitration: ICSID, under Turkey–UAE BIT
Parties: Investor vs. United Arab Emirates
Dispute: Land reclamation project
Outcome: Won arbitration for investor
Treaty: Turkish–UAE bilateral investment treaty